Results from the Constitutional Challenge in CA of 6/14/02:

Dear People,

Yesterday, Friday June 14, 2002, approximately 50 to 70 people gathered
in support of a formal Constitutional Challenge that was filed in San
Francisco Superior Court.
The days' events were opened by a street play, which parodied the
present court system. Then, several speakers took the podium who
moved the crowd with their palpable, salient; and often powerful stories
which displayed the outright collapse and corruption of the modern court
systems. Approximately 20 individuals joined the suit by way of a
legal process called INTERVENTION and signed right then and there (using
CCP $ 387 as the cited authority). Amazingly, even after the
event, we still have various persons still filing their interventions
with the court in order to join suit with this Constitutional Challenge.

The First speaker was John Nuccio, whose own daughter had died because
of the malfeasance of the court and irresponsibility of his ex-wife who
was eventually criminally charged because of that death. Mr. Nuccio
has fought valiantly for return of his son, who now lives in a similar
danger of his life, due to the irresponsibility and outright
feminization of the courts. His case clearly shows, that even when
the mother is a direct danger to the children (causing death), the
courts will STILL bend over backwards to give women rights and ignore
Fathers' palpable warnings. This means of course, that if a man is
indeed responsible--the courts will threaten and endanger the children's
lives in order to adhere to political correctness.

Other speakers again showed the panorama of problems fathers face:
kidnapping of their children; outrageous child support awards against
the father; false abuse allegations to disenfranchise men; abandonment
by the legal system; imprisonment for a debt; and a host of other
problems that these courts are specifically implementing against
fatherhood.

Sadly, even though more than 200 media groups were contacted, both by
mail and by phone as well as personal visits, no media showed up to this
event to report it. Again, this is in direct accordance with the
silent treatise, which is where the media have joined to uphold the
government-media complex, and intentionally keep the mass public
ignorant of the real issues, and real news which is occurring in our
society. The public doesn't know about the plight of fatherhood,
because the media doesn't want the public to be informed nor educated
upon this subject. The media are intentionally protecting the courts
(and their open criminality), and ignoring real news, at the expense of
certain groups--such as fathers groups who are now criminally enslaved
by this system making money off of them by government "programs".

However; Livebeat Dads, along with Madmen United and "Legends" Legal Aid
Society were not dissuaded. With all the legal paperwork at their
disposal, they formally filed into the court, located at 400 McAllister
street and formally filed a WRIT OF PRECIPAE showing the court clerk her
duties to formally and her mandate to legally file legal documents.
We then filed a Judicial Notice of the Petitioner Robert Lindsay; Cheney
Jr. to allow other persons to join by way of Intervention into this
action; and, we then formally filed the formal Constitutional Challenge.

There was great consternation behind the counter as court clerks read
the documents. The court clerks claimed that the documents needed a
"Judicial Council Cover sheet" (a form, developed by the Judicial
council and NOT mandatory). When the legal process servers demanded
from the court clerks for them to produce the MANDATORY law that
mandated that the Petitioner have this "Judicial Council form" the court
clerks could not produce it and they began getting mulct and very
quiet. The court clerks then stated that there had to be another
Judicial Council form for an In Pauperis Forma (fee waiver) filed for
this matter--to which again; the people serving noted that a formal and
legal In Pauperis Forma motion had already been filed into this matter
upon a NOTICE OF INTENTION TO FILE HABEAS CORPUS which had already been
filed. Again, the petitioners process servers demanded from the
clerks to produce the law which mandated that a Judicial Council In
Pauperis Forma motion form HAD to be used, and again; the clerks got
mulct and silent, and could not produce the law requiring it. (There
is none).

With all legal forms formally filed, the process servers demanded filing
of the Constitutional Challenge, to which after the court clerks again,
went back and held a nervous discussion on the matter and taking inside
direction for what they should do. Finally after over an hour
wait, they came back and refused to file the CONSTITUTIONAL
CHALLENGE...to which the petitioner's process server Nelson Kenyon
formally told them "You have been served" pushed the documents into the
open slot in the window and filed the massive paperwork onto the court
clerks' desk.

Reluctantly, the court clerk gathered them all up and took them.
Presently, after a short wait for a mail response from the San Francisco
Superior Court; the Constitutional challenge will be formally filed into
the California Supreme Court (as a writ of right) where we expect the
exact same thing to occur.

Again, the Constitutional Challenge is a WRIT HABEAS CORPUS, the
greatest legal document in mankind. It cannot be suspended in any
way shape or form, however; these courts are insolent and arrogantly
refusing to even accept the document. This is not just a danger to
all Californians, but to all FREE PEOPLES....as every free nation has
the Habeas Corpus as a writ of right, which cannot be suspended "except"
in cases of war or insurrection.

They are, and have been and will in the future; continue to illegally
suspend it, in direct violation of law.

They are telling fathers, that we can have NO redress, no matter what
form we seek it in.
Their own laws state that "IF" the Writ of Habeas Corpus is refused, (as
it was today in San Francisco)--then, it is a $10,000 fine against them,
of which we are filing suit against the Court clerk in San Francisco.

Again, it is becoming shamefully clear, that the people within the
courts; hate our free and lawful form of government--and that they are
"doing something else" and not obeying the law, and are completely
arrogant to the legal forms of trial. The idea that they will,
without formal comment or legal reason, suspend the Writ of Habeas
Corpus--is not only shocking, it is proof that these people are in fact,
a domestic enemy and a danger to ALL free Americans...not just fathers.

What we must note here is that the "rule of law" is no longer in
existence in this nation. What we are faced with is a power and
political struggle.

This was readily displayed upon the legal filing in court where the
President of Live Beat Dads was filming the event. A court bailiff
came up to him and with great invective told him not to film, or that he
would beat him to a pulp (or something to that effect). This gross
and open threat was captured on video, and shows the contempt those whom
are in the system have for those "who dare" stand up for their
constitutional rights.

Again, these people are acting more like the enemy because they are the
enemy. As those who would be our public servants would not even
consider attempting such outrageous acts.

We now are formally filing to the California Supreme Court where we
fully know and understand that a similar violation of law will occur.

Again, we must recognize an enemy when we see it. We have no hope by
the present corrupt regime embedded within these courts. The same is
true within the Federal system as well. These courts are only there
to uphold violations of law, openly and arrogantly committed by those
people in governmental power.

We have palpable legal issues presented in the courts, which the courts
are doing everything in their power NOT TO HEAR OR ADDRESS IN ANY WAY,
SHAPE, OR FORM. It is clear, that these courts are only there to
uphold the present regimes open corruption.

Many good people expended huge amounts of time and monies putting on
this endeavor. Steve Light and Richard Pitchers, as well as Terence
Moore are to be most noted and commended. Fathers came from around
the state in which to participate in this endeavor. And a coalition
of Fathers' Rights groups participated.

We will push this Constitutional Challenge up the courts. Please stay
tuned.
Thank you for your support.
Sincerely,
Robert Lindsay; Cheney Jr.

This information provided by

Custody Reform

Maintained by Caring Dad

(please click above to vote for this site)

JUNE is Domestic Violence Against Men Awareness Month